Facebook Live Killings

Read the article “Cleveland Shooting Highlights Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos” located at http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306.

Write a 4–5-page paper in which you do the following:

Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Suggest and elaborate on three ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Propose two safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not it should create these roles.
Propose two changes Facebook should adopt to encourage the ethical use of its platform.
Use the (Strayer University Library) to locate two quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference, and proprietary websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides; citations and follow the Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:

Analyze the legal standing and situation of a specific business to achieve a defined result.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric:

NAME: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
DESCRIPTION: LEG500 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT 1: FACEBOOK LIVE KILLINGS
Grid View
List View
Unacceptable Below 70% F Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A LEG500-A1-1
1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.

LEG500-A1-2
2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly suggested and elaborated on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.

LEG500-A1-3
3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 39.17 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 39.2 (14%) – 44.77 (15.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 44.8 (16%) – 50.37 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

Points Range: 50.4 (18%) – 56 (20%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.

LEG500-A1-4
4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they did not submit or incompletely discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they did not submit or incompletely debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they partially discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they partially debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they satisfactorily discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they satisfactorily debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly determined whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, they thoroughly discussed the key functions of these positions. If not, they thoroughly debated on whether or not they should create these roles.

LEG500-A1-5
5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 29.38 (10.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 29.4 (10.5%) – 33.58 (11.99%)

Partially proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 33.6 (12%) – 37.78 (13.49%)

Satisfactorily proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

Points Range: 37.8 (13.5%) – 42 (15%)

Thoroughly proposed two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.

LEG500-A1-6
6. 2 references
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9.79 (3.5%)

No references provided

Points Range: 9.8 (3.5%) – 11.19 (4%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Points Range: 11.2 (4%) – 12.59 (4.5%)

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range: 12.6 (4.5%) – 14 (5%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

LEG500-A1-7
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 19.59 (7%)

More than 6 errors present

Points Range: 19.6 (7%) – 22.39 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range: 22.4 (8%) – 25.19 (9%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range: 25.2 (9%) – 28 (10%)

0-2 errors present

My Homework Nest
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.